| 12:00 PM EST

EVs’ Impact on Employment

#Volkswagen #Samsung #LG


Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

By this point, the majority of players in the auto industry should be aware of the impending electrification juggernaut.  Most automotive suppliers should, as well, have either begun planning or are already executing strategies for navigating this major shift, especially if they’re primarily in the powertrain business. With so many factors to keep track of—from how they will scale down powertrain production to the best way to manage the shift in their supply chains—it is no wonder that one of the most crucial items is also the one least likely to come up in a discussion: what happens to the workforce?

A recent study by the Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering (iao.fraunhofer.de/lang-en) concluded that if nothing changes and electrification proceeds to take over as projected, Germany can expect to lose an estimated 75,000 jobs by 2030—and this accounts for the 25,000 jobs electrification is estimated to generate. The chairman of IG Metall, one of the study’s sponsors, reiterated that while such figures are no reason to panic, they do demand very strategic planning in order to facilitate the best outcome possible. IG Metall is a German metalworkers’ union, so it has more than passing interest in the implications.

On the grand scale of Germany’s auto industry jobs, this figure seems like a drop in the bucket. But it would be irresponsible not to consider the global ramifications of such a prediction.

For instance, in the United States alone, nearly one-million people are employed in auto parts manufacturing, more than 10 times the number in Germany. In Japan, 8.7 percent of the population are employed in auto parts manufacturing (or in closely-related industries). Essentially, these statistics represent a significant number of people who, without careful planning on the part of auto suppliers, have the potential to lose their livelihoods in little over 10 years.

Bloomberg points out that the surge in automotive electrification could have a minor impact on workers globally, but a devastating one on smaller, manufacturing-dependent regions. Not having a solid and responsible plan in place could mean the destabilization of more than automotive manufacturing companies, but also entire towns and cities all over the world who rely on powertrain jobs for their economic success.

Some companies are already taking proactive measures. Volkswagen, for example, is not filling certain positions after workers retire or leave, hoping that over time this will minimize the blow to their powertrain business workforce; it’s not certain how successful this strategy will be given the speed at which the electrification clock is ticking. They’re also retraining some existing employees as software engineers in an attempt to bolster the portion of their workforce that will be increasingly needed in coming years due to this shift in electrification.

The shift electrification is having on the traditional skills and specialties of workers is already becoming evident. Traditional automotive systems rely on mechanical engineering, which is being reduced in importance as the industry shifts to a new set of competencies: chemical engineering for advanced battery development and electrical and software engineering for propulsion and other electronic systems, to name just two.

This shift will create significant challenges for existing automotive suppliers but is a great opportunity for new entrants (like LG and Samsung) to quickly attract and deploy these new, needed engineering resources. New entrants, predominantly from consumer and industrial electronics, have a significant advantage when you consider the following:

  • Flexibility: has existing electronics “backbone” or operating model
  • Scale to leverage: currently serves multiple industries
  • Competencies: deployable workforce of electrical talent
  • Speed: experience in fast-paced consumer electronics.

Companies predominantly involved in the traditional powertrain business need to take a hard look at their strategies for the next 10 years. This goes beyond their plans for safely winding down their production to develop an understanding of what these businesses are transitioning to, not just for shareholders, but for the sake of their workforce. 

The companies that refuse to see the writing on the wall will suffer a far more detrimental impact — and in many more areas — than they expect.  At stake is not only the bottom line of the companies themselves, but also the success of individuals, their families, and the micro-economies of the communities in which they live.




  • Designing the 2019 Ram 1500

    Ram Truck chief exterior designer Joe Dehner talks about how they’ve developed the all-new pickup. “We’ve been building trucks for over 100 years,” he says. “Best I could come up with is that this is our 15th-generation truck.”  

  • Pacifica Hybrid Explained

    Chrysler pioneered the modern-day minivan more than 30 years ago and has been refining and improving that type of vehicle ever since.

  • Mercedes GLK250 BlueTEC 4MATIC: Bringing Diesel Tech to a Midsize SUV

    Mercedes has been putting diesels in vehicles since 1926. It has been offering them in the U.S. since 1949. And 2013 is seeing a range of offerings, including in its popular GLK SUV.