Robotic Tape System Developed
Masking tape has its genesis in the automotive body shop, back in the 1920s when an employee of 3M watched painters have difficultly removing the paper that they had affixed to vehicles to “mask” portions of the cars from the paint that was being applied.
Masking tape has its genesis in the automotive body shop, back in the 1920s when an employee of 3M watched painters have difficultly removing the paper that they had affixed to vehicles to “mask” portions of the cars from the paint that was being applied. The idea was to create tape that would make it easier, and thus masking tape came to be developed.
The point of which is that 3M has long been involved in the auto industry. And hasn’t stopped coming up with the ways and means to improve processes.
Which brings us to a new development from 3M and Eckhart, a Warren, Michigan-based engineering company that is involved in a variety of things, ranging from autonomous guided vehicles to tooling.
The two companies have come up with the 3M Automated Taping System (ATS), which is based on a collaborative robot and has the capability of performing tasks including supplying adhesion promoters, creating extended liner tabs, and positioning cut-to-length tape or die cuts onto components.
Explains Rachel Moses, U.S. Business Manager, 3M Automotive and Aerospace Solutions Div., “The 3M Automotive Taping system uses collaborative robot technology to optimize ergonomic safety, first-time quality, and productivity while reducing the factory footprint required to apply tape where the systems are deployed.”
Maybe its not on the masking tape scale, but it certainly could be beneficial to OEMs nonetheless.
And who knows: maybe some day just as DIYers use masking tape at home, this type of system may make its way out of the factory and into the basement. . . .
Here's an overview of the study of assembly plant productivity that gets the undivided attention of all automakers: "The Harbour Report." Although the Big Three companies are getting better, they still have a way to go. But given the levels of competition, better won't be good enough for some plants, it seems.
According to Kunihiro Hoshi, chief engineer for the GX 470: “Three of my top goals were to create a body-on-frame vehicle with sweeping off-road performance and unibody-like on-road capability, and, of course, it had to meet the Lexus quality standard.” He met his goals. But why would anyone want to bang this vehicle around on rocks?
Many countries who once were major players from a vehicle production/export perspective are finding it difficult to even find their niche today.